|
Resources on the Ethics of Human Stem Cell Research
By Louis Guenin
Any program of research concerning human stem cells
places moral demands upon investigators at least insofar as the
research uses human tissues. In fulfillment of a moral view originating
with Kant, we constrain ourselves to respect the autonomy of every
prospective tissue donor. Our concern for donor autonomy is not
peculiar to the practice of stem cell research, but arises with
respect to all research involving human subjects. We have installed,
or so we think, an institutional protection of autonomy. The protection
takes the form of the rule that an investigator may accept a tissue
donation only from a donor who, understanding the ramifications
of donation, freely consents thereto.
Embryonic stem cell research poses a moral problem
that, in the general case of human subjects research, we do not
encounter. In the general case, the investigator is obliged to
take every effort to protect the donor’s welfare. In the
case of embryonic stem cell research, the typical experiment will
consume its embryo subject. Are embryo-destructive experiments
morally permissible? To advance beyond commentary and opinion,
of which there is an ample supply, and to allow the interested
reader to understand this issue rigorously, the following bibliography
sets forth works in which the reader will see the fundamental arguments
fully and concisely presented. The bibliography also includes sources
bearing on a controversial special case of human embryo use, the
nonprocreative use of cloning.
I. THE MORAL STATUS OF THE HUMAN EMBRYO
| Dunstan, G. ‘The Moral Status of the Human
Embryo: A Tradition Recalled.’ Journal of Medical
Ethics 10: 38-44 (1984). ABSTRACT |
| Dworkin, R. Life’s Dominion (New York:
Knopf, 1993). |
II. EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH
| [1] |
Scientific Exposition with Remarks on Moral
Concerns |
| |
Kiessling, A. and Anderson, S. Human Embryonic
Stem Cells (Sudbury, Mass.: Jones and Bartlett, 2003). |
| |
|
| [2] |
The Moral Case for ES Cell Research |
| |
Guenin, L. ‘Morals and Primordials.’
Science 292: 1659-1660 (2001). TEXT |
| |
Hare, R. Essays on Bioethics (Oxford: Clarendon
Press, 1993). |
| |
|
| [3] |
The Moral Case against ES Cell Research |
| |
Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
Declarato de Abortu Procurato (Vatican City, 1974).
TEXT |
| |
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Donum
Vitae (Vatican City, 1987). TEXT |
| |
Pellegrino, E. Testimony, in National Bioethics
Advisory Commission, Ethical Issues in Human Stem Cell Research,
vol. III (Washington: NBAC, 2000), pp. F-1—F-5. TEXT |
| |
Munn, D. ‘Moral Issues of Human Embryo
Research.’ Science 293: 211 (2001). |
III. THE MORALITY OF SOMATIC
CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER
| [1] |
Nonprocreative Cloning |
| |
| [a] |
The Practice Per Se |
| |
Kavka, G. ‘The Paradox of Future Individuals.’ Philosophy
and Public Affairs 11: 93-112 (1982). |
| |
Guenin, L. ‘The Set of Embryo Subjects.’ Nature
Biotechnology 21: 482-483 (2003). |
| |
|
| [b] |
Collateral Effects |
| |
Resnik, D. ‘Regulating the Market for
Human Eggs.’ Bioethics 15: 1-25 (2001).
ABSTRACT |
|
| |
|
| [2] |
Fears of Procreative Cloning |
| |
Brock, D. ‘Human Cloning and Our Sense
of Self.’ Science 296: 314-316 (2002).
TEXT |
Updated: November 12, 2003
|